As a Committed Capitalist, Yet Universal Medicare Is the Top Hope for US Health System
Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.
Baffled? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.
The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Expensive
Based on recent research, typical households pays $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.
Now the government is shut down because partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.
When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?
How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.
I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.
How National Health Insurance Could Function
A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays about 13.75%.
Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of clients who are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.
Implementation in the US
For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of our government's defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.
Advantages for Entrepreneurs
Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).
It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.
Capitalist Perspective
I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.
Considering Challenges
Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.
Time for Realistic Evaluation
We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.